When we try to consider the state of the modern world through the lens of the laws of nature, we find it challenging. Humans have been altering the world since the beginning of their existence to survive. However, the consequences of our actions are often ignored, and we end up destroying things that are not needed for survival.
This is quite different from any other animal on earth, as humans are uniquely determined to extend life and will go to great lengths to achieve that goal. Unfortunately, we also tend to harm each other within our species for personal gain and survival. This is a sad reality that we must acknowledge and work to change.
The greed for life is an inherent trait of the human species, and we must learn to control it to sustain the planet and all the living beings that inhabit it. It is indeed a difficult task to comprehend the state of the modern world when viewed through the lens of the laws of nature.
How good are we at destroying the balance of the world by prolonging life?
The natural lifespan of humans, meaning the typical duration of life without external factors such as disease, accidents, or other unnatural causes of death, is influenced by various biological and environmental factors. Historically, before significant advances in healthcare and living conditions, life expectancy was considerably lower than today.
In prehistoric times and early human history, life expectancy was significantly shorter, with estimates ranging from around 20 to 40 years. This lower lifespan was primarily due to higher rates of infant mortality, infectious diseases, injuries, and limited access to medical care and sanitation.
However, human life expectancy increased as societies developed and medical advancements occurred. Improved healthcare, sanitation, nutrition, vaccinations, and advancements in medical treatments have all contributed to longer lifespans.
As of recent years, the global average life expectancy at birth is approximately 72.6 years, according to the World Health Organization’s statistics. However, life expectancy varies widely between countries and regions, influenced by factors such as access to healthcare, socioeconomic status, lifestyle choices, and environmental conditions.
While there’s a natural biological limit to human lifespan, current trends suggest that medical science and technology advancements may continue to extend life expectancy. However, this extension may be limited, as there are likely biological constraints to how long humans can live.
Defying nature by increasing lifespan
The impact of extending human life on the world’s balance is a topic of great debate. The law of nature states that if humans live alongside other animals without additional resources, their lifespan is about forty years.
However, this situation has changed dramatically with the advent of modern medicine. Today, humans have access to various medical treatments and technologies that have doubled their natural lifespan.
This is a remarkable achievement that no other animal species has yet to achieve. However, it is also a double-edged sword that poses a significant threat to the world’s existence.
The elephant that lived in the past and the elephant that exists today have the same lifespan, but the same cannot be said for humans. Humans have managed to double their lifespan, a drastic change with far-reaching consequences.
This raises an important question: is this a sustainable trend? The world is already grappling with many environmental issues that threaten its existence. Adding to this, the exponential growth of the human population will only exacerbate these problems.
It is unclear what impact doubling the human lifespan will have on the world, but it could lead to unforeseen and potentially catastrophic consequences.
While extending human life is a remarkable achievement, but also a cause for concern. We must carefully consider the consequences of our actions and strive to find a balance between progress and sustainability. Otherwise, we risk destroying the delicate balance of the world and endangering the future of all life on earth.
The average lifespan is forty years
“If the lifespan of a man is forty years, let’s examine how those forty years pass. A man spends his first ten years as a child from birth to completion. From age ten until he turns 18, he lives as a youth. After that, he gradually becomes old until his death.
As a man attains youth, the body gradually decays, and youth does not stay in one place. Similarly, the life cycle of women is also arranged in a specific pattern and governed by the laws of nature.
A girl child usually reaches puberty between the ages of 8 and 14, which is when a woman becomes eligible to nurture a child in her womb. The peak period for this condition is between 10 and 12 years.
No matter how old a woman is, there is no difference. Whether her average lifespan is 40 years or 80 years, a woman matures in the age group mentioned earlier. This is a powerful law of nature.
Both boys and girls reach puberty at around the same time. From that point on, a woman can have children.”
If you give birth to children from the age of twelve
Breastfeeding is an essential part of a child’s early years. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), it is recommended that a child should be breastfed exclusively for the first six months after birth. After this period, solid foods can be gradually introduced into the baby’s diet while continuing to breastfeed for two years or more.
However, in the context of a woman’s reproductive lifespan, it is essential to consider how many children she can have in her lifetime. Suppose a woman gives birth to her first child at 12. In that case, she is responsible for the child’s care until they can live independently.
During the period when the child is solely dependent on the mother’s milk, she cannot conceive another child. This is because the baby receives all their nutritional needs from the mother’s milk, and the mother’s body requires time to replenish its nutrients before another pregnancy.
As per the natural law of childbirth, a woman should maintain a minimum two-year gap between each child to ensure that both the mother and child are healthy.
Therefore, considering all these factors, it is essential to plan the number of children a woman can have in her 40 years of life. This will depend on several factors, including the age at which she has her first child, the intervals between pregnancies, and her overall health and well-being.
It is the general law of nature that a woman can give birth to only a few children in her lifetime. This is the law of automatic control of population growth.
the pace of life
In the past, the human population had a relatively short lifespan of about forty years. However, just like other animals, their population growth was controlled. As per the laws of nature, the pace of life, which is the correlation between body size and lifespan, determines that animals with larger bodies usually have longer lifespans. For example, elephants have a massive body and can live for up to 70 years.
It is interesting to note that despite humans having much smaller bodies than elephants, they can still live as long as them due to the advances in modern medicine. Without these medical discoveries, this similarity in lifespan would be impossible.
On the other hand, although elephants can live for seventy years, their population growth is prolonged. In contrast, the growth of the human population is much more rapid, which is unnatural.
This is because, while small-bodied animals such as ants reproduce in large numbers, their lifespan is very short. Therefore, the reproduction of humans does not follow the natural order of things.
Universal law is common to all
According to nature, everything that exists in the world has a purpose for its existence. This universal law applies to every living thing, including animals and the natural environment. Therefore, nature has a mechanism that ensures that anything that becomes a burden to the world is eliminated.
This mechanism also applies to humans, even though they have artificially extended their lifespan. Unfortunately, this extension has resulted in humans disturbing the universe’s balance. Most of an individual’s life is spent as if it is of no use to the world, primarily because old age lasts for an extended period.
If humans were to live according to nature, they would only have to fight for survival in the early stages of their lives, between the ages of 18 and 30. This is when they are physically capable of hunting and gathering food for survival. However, an older adult cannot go hunting; in today’s world, older adults rely on others to survive.
This dependency on others is unnatural and goes against the laws of nature. If the human lifespan were shorter, around 40 years, this situation would not arise. It is essential to respect nature and live in harmony with it to maintain the balance of the universe. If people were to live like this, the population of today’s world would be half of what it is now.
